Artikel

The Effectiveness of Heutagogy Approach on Student Learning Achievement

Penulis

  • INDRI AJENG SETYONINGRUM UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SEMARANG

DOI

https://doi.org/10.59935/lej.v5i1.309

Kata Kunci:

  • heutagogy approach
  • effective learning
  • digital entrepreneurship learning

Abstrak

This study examines the effectiveness of the heutagogy approach in learning digital entrepreneurship for learners of intermediate-level equivalency programs at Community Learning Centres (CLCs) or Pusat Kegiatan Belajar Masyarakat (PKBM). This research used a parallel group experimental design involving 40 learners that naturally divided into control and experimental groups. Both groups received the same material in an equal amount of time but with different learning approaches: the control group used conventional direct learning methods, while the experimental group followed heutagogy-based learning. Learning outcomes were evaluated through knowledge measurement using the same instrument, and differences between groups were analyzed using the ANCOVA parametric statistical test, taking into account covariates to increase the validity of the analysis. The results showed that the group that followed the heutagogy approach experienced a significant increase in learning outcomes compared to the control group. The questionnaire results reinforced findings, which revealed that heutagogy-based learning increased learners' awareness of learning needs, independence, and self-reflection. This research confirms that the heutagogy approach is efficacious in improving the cognitive aspects of learning and encourages the development of character and independent learning competencies that are very important in non-formal education.

Statistik Unduhan Data OJS

  • 440 Abstrak dilihat
  • 559 PDF diunduh
  • – Unduhan 12 bulan
  • – Bulan teratas
Unduhan per bulan · 12 bulan terakhir
Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi 64

  1. Abdelrahman, R. M. (2020). Metacognitive awareness and academic motivation and their impact on academic achievement of Ajman University students. Heliyon, 6(9), e04192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04192
  2. Adeoye, M. A., Akinnubi, P. O., Makinde, S. O., Ibrahim Solahudeen Owoyale-Abdulganiy, & Abiola, M. O. (2024). Unveiling the Power of Pedagogically Productive Conversations Among University Teachers. Jurnal Pedagogi Dan Pembelajaran, 7(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.23887/jp2.v7i1.71177
  3. Agaoglu, F. O., Ba?, M., & Tarsuslu, S. (2025). Promoting organizational learning in nursing: examining the influence of participatory leadership, psychological ownership and motivation. Journal of Health Organization and Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-10-2024-0399
  4. Agonács, N., & Matos, J. (2019). Heutagogy and self-determined learning: a review of the published literature on the application and implementation of the theory. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 34(223–240). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1562329
  5. Agonács, N., & Matos, J. F. (2019). Heutagogy and self-determined learning: a review of the published literature on the application and implementation of the theory. Open Learning, 34(3), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1562329
  6. Amelia Andari. (2024). Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills Through Project-Based Learning Image-Assisted in Elementary School. International Journal of Teaching, 2(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.61798/ijt.v2i1.16
  7. Atteberry, A., & LaCour, S. E. (2021). Making a Tough Choice: Teacher Target-Setting and Student Achievement in a Teacher Performance System Using Student Learning Objectives. AERA Open, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420979778
  8. Aysi, S., Susilaningsih, S., & Sabandi, M. (2024). The Implementation of Digital Entrepreneurship Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Pedagogia?: Jurnal Pendidikan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v13i2.1692
  9. Barbosa, P. L. S., Carmo, R. A. F. do, Gomes, J. P. P., & Viana, W. (2024). Adaptive learning in computer science education: A scoping review. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 29). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12066-z
  10. Beasleigh, S., Bish, M., & Mahoney, A. (2023). The learning needs and clinical requirements of post graduate critical care nursing students in rural and regional contexts: A scoping review. Australian Critical Care?: Official Journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2023.06.001
  11. Blaschke, L. M., Blaschke, L., & Kenyon, C. (2018). Experiences in self-determined learning Experiences in Self-determinded Learning.
  12. Blaschke, L. M., & Hase, S. (2016). Heutagogy: A Holistic Framework for Creating Twenty-First-Century Self-determined Learners. The Future of Ubiquitous Learning,. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47724-3_2
  13. Blaschke, L. M., & Marín, V. I. (2020). Applications of heutagogy in the educational use of e-portfolios. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 20(64). https://doi.org/10.6018/RED.407831
  14. Canning, N., & Callan, S. (2010). Heutagogy: Spirals of reflection to empower learners in higher education. Reflective Practice, 11(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940903500069
  15. Chen, L., & Ifenthaler, D. (2023). Investigating digital entrepreneurship competence in an online practical training program. The International Journal of Management Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100894
  16. Colomer, J., Serra, T., Cañabate, D., & Bubnys, R. (2020). Reflective learning in higher education: Active methodologies for transformative practices. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(9), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093827
  17. Davis, K. A., & Knight, D. B. (2023). Assessing learning processes rather than outcomes: using critical incidents to explore student learning abroad. Higher Education, 85(2), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00836-6
  18. Diep, A., Zhu, C., Cocquyt, C., Greef, M., Vo, M., & Vanwing, T. (2019). dult Learners’ Needs in Online and Blended Learning. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 59(223–253).
  19. Gillaspy, E., & Vasilica, C. (2021). Developing the digital self-determined learner through heutagogical design. Higher Education Pedagogies, 6(1), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2021.1916981
  20. Gonzales, S., Fernandez, C., & Wei, L. (2025). Adopting Heutagogy in Non-Formal Education: A Participatory Action Research with Community Learning Centers. Journal Neosantara Hybrid Learning, 3(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.70177/jnhl.v3i1.2186
  21. Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102(April), 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
  22. Guo, P., Saab, N., Wu, L., & Admiraal, W. (2021). The Community of Inquiry perspective on students’ social presence, cognitive presence, and academic performance in online project-based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1479–1493. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12586
  23. Hadar, L. L., & Brody, D. L. (2021). Interrogating the role of facilitators in promoting learning in teacher educators’ professional communities. Professional Development in Education, 47(4), 599–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1839782
  24. Hainsworth, N., Dowse, E., Cummins, A., Ebert, L., & Foureur, M. (2022). Heutagogy: A self-determined learning approach for Midwifery Continuity of Care experiences. Nurse Education in Practice, 60(103329). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103329
  25. Hase, S., & Blaschke, L. M. (2021). Unleashing the Power of Learner Agency. Edtech Books, 67–76. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/up
  26. Ishaq, I Nyoman S. Degeng, Henry Praherdhiono, & Made Duananda Kartika Degeng. (2024). Learning Design Heutagogical Approach in Developing Self-Determined Learning Skills. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 8(2), 373–383. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v8i2.76371
  27. Jiang, H. J., Underwood, T. C., Bell, J. G., Ranjan, S., Sasselov, D., & Whitesides, G. M. (2017). Mimicking Lighting-Induced Electrochemistry on the Early Earth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas
  28. Juin, J. K. (2016). Exploring the Use of Learning Contracts among Low English Proficiency Rural Learners. The English Teacher, 45(3), 114–125. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/exploring-use-learning-contracts-among-low/docview/1903432858/se-2?accountid=14696%0Ahttps://umaryland.on.worldcat.org/atoztitles/link?sid=ProQ:&issn=01287729&volume=45&issue=3&title=The+English+Teacher&spage=11
  29. Knapke, J. M., Hildreth, L., Molano, J. R., Schuckman, S. M., Blackard, J. T., Johnstone, M., … Mendell, A. (2024). Andragogy in Practice: Applying a Theoretical Framework to Team Science Training in Biomedical Research. British Journal of Biomedical Science, 81(March), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.12651
  30. Koehler, A. A., & Meech, S. (2022). Ungrading Learner Participation in a Student-Centered Learning Experience. TechTrends, 66(1), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00682-w
  31. Korfiatis, K., & Petrou, S. (2021). Participation and why it matters: children’s perspectives and expressions of ownership, motivation, collective efficacy and self-efficacy and locus of control. Environmental Education Research, 27(12), 1700–1722. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.1959900
  32. Kulchan, S., Pimdee, P., & Sukkamart, A. (2025). Assessing version control system skill gaps in undergraduate IT education: A needs assessment of academic and industry stakeholder perspective. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(4), 2502–2514. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i4.6590
  33. Lan, P. S., Liu, M. C., & Baranwal, D. (2020a). Applying contracts and online communities to promote student self-regulation in English learning at the primary-school level. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1789674
  34. Lan, P. S., Liu, M. C., & Baranwal, D. (2020b). Applying contracts and online communities to promote student self-regulation in English learning at the primary-school level. Interactive Learning Environments, 4820, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1789674
  35. Larkins, C., & Satchwell, C. (2023). Learning How to Know Together: Using Barthes and Aristotle to Turn From ‘Training’ to ‘Collaborative Learning’ in Participatory Research with Children and Young People. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231164607
  36. Li, N. (2023). Research on the cultivation of students’ independent learning ability. Adult and Higher Education, 5(19), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.23977/aduhe.2023.051906
  37. Lynch, M., Sage, T., Hitchcock, L., & Sage, M. (2021). A heutagogical approach for the assessment of Internet Communication Technology (ICT) assignments in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00290-x
  38. Madsgaard, A., Røykenes, K., Smith-Strøm, H., & Kvernenes, M. (2022). The affective component of learning in simulation-based education – facilitators’ strategies to establish psychological safety and accommodate nursing students’ emotions. BMC Nursing, 21(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00869-3
  39. Martens, S. E., Meeuwissen, S. N. E., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Bovill, C., & Könings, K. D. (2019). Student participation in the design of learning and teaching: Disentangling the terminology and approaches. Medical Teacher, 41(10), 1203–1205. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1615610
  40. Mohaffyza, M., Foong, L., Masek, A., Heong, Y., & Putra, A. (2020). Practices Of Heutagogical Activities Among Malaysia Technical University Students.
  41. Mohd Affandi, H., & Mohamad, N. (2023). The Integration of Industry Case-Based-Environmental Sustainability with Heutagogy Approach in Evaluating the Thinking Skills Among Technical Students. Jurnal Kejuruteraan, si6(2), 161–165. https://doi.org/10.17576/jkukm-2023-si6(2)-17
  42. Motta, V., & Galina, S. (2023). Experiential learning in entrepreneurship education: A systematic literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103919
  43. Nurfadhilla, N. (2020). Upaya Meningkatkan Efikasi Diri Melalui Layanan Bimbingan Konseling. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling Islam), 3(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.32505/enlighten.v3i1.1495
  44. Nwogu, G. A., Tommy, K. A., Fadiya, A. A., Utoware, J. D. A., Balogun, B. N., Adeyanju, S. I., … Kolawole, A. O. (2025). Effectiveness of Self-Directed Learning in Adult Education: A Comparative Study. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope, 6(2), 1388–1400. https://doi.org/10.47857/irjms.2025.v06i02.03147
  45. Oh JW, Huh B, K. M. (2019). Effect of learning contracts in clinical pediatric nursing education on students’ outcomes: A research article. A Research Article. Nurse Educ Today, 83(104191). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.08.009
  46. Onwuatuegwu, I. N. (2023). An Investigation into the Philosophical Differences between Pedagogical and Andragogical Approaches to Education. Journal of Education Review Provision, 3(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.55885/jerp.v3i1.181
  47. Paul, J., Alhassan, I., Binsaif, N., & Singh, P. (2023). Digital entrepreneurship research: A systematic review. Journal of Business Research, 156(November 2022), 113507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113507
  48. Ratten, V., & Usmanij, P. (2021). Entrepreneurship education: Time for a change in research direction? International Journal of Management Education, 19(1), 100367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100367
  49. Ripatti-Torniainen, L., & Stevanovic, M. (2023). University teaching development workshops as sites of joint decision-making: Negotiations of authority in academic cultures. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 38(September 2022), 100681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100681
  50. Sari, Y., Swastika, A., & Tanyono, D. (2025). Students Mathematical Reflective Thinking Ability in Solving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Type Problems as Seen From Cognitive Style. Jurnal Dimensi Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 13(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.24269/dpp.v13i1.10599
  51. Satar, M., Alharthi, S., Omeish, F., Alshibani, S., & Saqib, N. (2024). Digital Learning Orientation and Entrepreneurial Competencies in Graduates: Is Blended Learning Sustainable? Sustainability. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177794
  52. Schwarz, W. (2025). The Ancova model for comparing two groups: a tutorial emphasizing statistical distribution theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1600764
  53. Sewell, C. B., & Harris, H. J. (2019). Before You Tie the Knot?: Mapping Pedagogy , Learning Outcomes , and Effect Size in Premarital Education. (October).
  54. Shaby, N., Peleg, R., & Coombs, I. (2024). Participatory Research with Museum Practitioners: A reflection on the process. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10167-4
  55. Stanton, J. D., Sebesta, A. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2021). Fostering metacognition to support student learning and performance. CBE Life Sciences Education, 20(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-12-0289
  56. Stoten, D. (2021). Building adaptive management capability: the contribution of heutagogy to management development in turbulent times. Journal of Management Development, 40(121–137). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-10-2019-0448
  57. Sumarsono, D., & Permana, D. (2023). Contract Learning as Individualized Instructional Strategies in Improving Students’ Performance in Academic Writing Courses. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 11(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i1.6683
  58. Sutarjo, S., Acep Bahrum Kamil, A. B. K., Ma’shum, S. M., Zahra, W. H., Bintang Kejora, M. T., & Nurul Husna, A. I. (2025). Project-Based Learning Through a Heutagogic Approach in Higher Education: Challenges, Technology and Implementation. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(1), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i1.6026
  59. Swartz, M. K. (2019). Promoting Academic and Clinical Success Through Learning Contracts. Journal of Nursing Education, 58(6)(372). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20190521-11
  60. Tunstall, R., & Neergaard, H. (2021). Flashmob: A Heutagogical Tool for Social Learning in Entrepreneurship Education. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 5(472–492). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/25151274211017547
  61. Wong, B., Li, K., & Chan, H. (2023). Identification of personalised learning needs: A literature review. International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET58841.2023.00040
  62. Yoto, Y., Ulfatin, N. R., Zahro, A., Putra, A. B., Subandi, M. S., Rochmawati, R., & Santoso, A. (2022). The Heutagogy Model of Learning Innovation in Increasing The Skill Needs of The Digital Era of Vocational Students. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 28(2), 98. https://doi.org/10.17977/um048v28i2p98-104
  63. Zandi, H., Kaivanpanah, S., & Alavi, S. M. (2015). Contract Learning As an Approach to Individualizing EFL Education in the Context of Assessment for Learning. Language Assessment Quarterly, 12(4), 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2015.1104315
  64. Zhang, F., Xia, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, J., Xia, J., & Chen, C. C. (2025). A mixed methods study of adult learners’ online learning motivation profiles. Education and Information Technologies, 14043–14068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13382-2

Unduh

  • pdf Open Access 559 unduhan

Diterbitkan

2025-07-15

Cara Mengutip

SETYONINGRUM, I. A. (2025). The Effectiveness of Heutagogy Approach on Student Learning Achievement. Lifelong Education Journal, 5(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.59935/lej.v5i1.309

Terbitan

Vol 5 No 1 (2025): April

Bagian

Artikel

Lisensi

Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Lifelong Education Journal

Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.